Suchergebnisse

The General Principles of Good Government are currently one of the assessment bases for the judges in the Administrative Court to examine whether or not actions of the government contains the elements of harm for the community. The existence of Law No.30 of 2014 on Government Administration has expanded the competence of The Administrative Court (PTUN) in which the object of lawsuit in the Administrative Court is not only the Decisions of Administrative (beschikking) but also factual action from official or administrative institutions. With the amendment of Law No.5 of 1986 on the Administrative Court namely Law No. 9 of 2004 and Law No.51 of 2009 affirms the existence of The General Principles of Good Government as one of reasons to sue in the Administrative Court. It is inevitable today that the concept of Islamic law is widely used and applied in legal actions, whether in the realm of business law, private law or public law. Therefore, the concept of good government according to Islam needs to be studied further, often referred to as the concept of fiqh siyasah. This study is aimed to examine the comparison between the concept of The General Principles of Good Government with the concept of fiqh siyasah.

Nowadays, The Institutional of environmental in regional experinced many changes, its cause of stipulated of Law No. 23 of 2014 on Local Government and Government Act No. 18 of 2016 on Local Government Organization. Rule about central government authority and local government authority on environment aspect that ruled by Act No. 32 of 2009 on Protection and Management of Environment must be adjusted with Act No. 23 of 2014 on Local Government and Government Act No. 18 of 2016 on Local Government Organization. This research analyze about institutional harmonization on statute approaches. It is expected that this research give a knowledge of affairs which central government authority, province government authority, and district/regency government authority clearly especially on environment aspect. The minister of environment and forestry in order to implementing coordinative function, should be obliged to synchronize working program of environment institution between local and central government for making integrated environment management (policy) approaches.

In Article 1, Sub-Article 7, Act Number 6 2014 on Villages, it said that the Village Regulation is a regulation stipulated by the Urban Village Head after being discussed and agreed with the Village Consultative Body. The determination of the Village Regulation is an elaboration of the various authorities which are owned by the Village which refers to the provisions of the higher legislation. As a legal product, Village Regulation should not conflict with the higher regulations and should not harm the public interest, or the general interest as mentioned in Act Number 6 2014 on Villages which are: a. the disruption of communal harmony; b. the disruptionof access to public services; c. the disruption of public order and tranquillity; d. the disruption of economic activities to improve the welfare of village communities; and e. the discrimination against tribe, religion, belief, race, intergroup, and gender. Village Regulations govern the village authority based on the right of origin and village local-scale a thority. The implementation is supervised by the village communities and Village Consultative Body. It is intended to make the implementation of the Village Regulation always monitored continuously by local villagers because village regulations are set for the benefit of the village community as a whole. The provisions on the right of origin are explained as "the right of origin" which is a living legacy and the initiative of the village or the initiative of the village's society in accordance with the development of community life, including indigenous peoples' organisational systems, institutions, customary law, the ground of the village's treasury, and agreements in village life as well. The meaning of "village-scale local authority" is the authority to regulate and manage the interests of the village community that has is conducted by the village, is able and effective when conducted by the village or what has arisen because of the development of the village and the village community, such as boat moorin ...

Era otonomi daerah dalam dinamika demokrasi sekarang ini menuntut adanya partisipasi masyarakat, tidak terkecuali masyarakat desa dalam rangka mewujudkan pembangunan nasional. Oleh karena itu diperlukan regulasi di tingkat daerah termasuk regulasi di desa. Desa merupakan cikal bakal terbentuknya masyarakat politik dan pemerintahan di Indonesia jauh sebelum Negara bangsa ini terbentuk, desa merupakan daerah dengan karakter yang unik, yang dapat menyelengarakan fungsi pemerintahan dan memiliki tradisi yang berbeda antara satu dengan yang lain. Akan tetapi dalam konteks kekinian telah terjadi pergeseran otonomi di desa, dimana sekarang desa tidak lagi memiliki hak otonomi. Dalam pemerintahan desa, terdapat regulasi untuk menjalankan pemerintahan desa berdasarkan wewenang yang dimiliki desa yaitu peraturan desa. Namun karena telah terjadi pergeseran otonomi desa, peraturan desa dalam perkembangannya hanya merupakan penjabaran lebih lanjut peraturan yang lebih tinggi bukan untuk menjalankan otonomi.Kata Kunci: Peraturan Desa, Pemerintahan Desa, Otonomi.

The implementation of a judicial review, which is conducted separately by the Constitutional Court, and the Supreme Court, is considered to be inappropriate with the ideals of building a harmonious, and integrated legal system. In its practice, it has been proven that the authority of the judicial review to the Constitutional Court, and the Supreme Court encourages various issues. The substantive difference between the tests conducted by the Constitutional Court, and those conducted by the Supreme Court, isthe process of examining the trial of the legislation under the law, and against the law by the Supreme Court was conducted in private. The cases handled by the Supreme Court were numerous, not just the legislation testing cases, but also the cases of cassation, and other legal matter. The relationship between the two judicial institutions, namely the Supreme Court, and the Constitutional Court, has become out of sync in the Indonesian constitutional system. The enforcement of the constitution integrally in all laws and regulations has become challenging to materialise. It becomes the loss of the power of the Supreme Court decision for a test case. When the norms that are used as the basis by the Supreme Court are declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court, there will be conflicting decisions.

Abstrak Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik saat ini menjadi salah satu dasar penilaian bagi hakim di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara untuk menguji suatu tindak pemerintah tersebut mengandung unsur kerugian bagi masyarakat atau tidak. Adanya UU 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan telah memperluas kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha negara dimana obyek gugatan dalam PTUN tidak hanya KTUN (beschikking) akan tetapi juga tindakan faktual dari pejabat atau badan tata usaha negara. Dengan adanya perubahan UU No. 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yaitu UU No. 9 Tahun 2004 dan UU No. 51 Tahun 2009 mempertegas keberadaan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik sebagai alasan menggugat di PTUN. Tidak bisa dipungkiri saat ini konsep hukum Islam banyak dipakai dan diterapkan dalam tindakan-tindakan hukum, baik dalam ranah hukum bisnis atau privat maupun hukum publik. Oleh karena itu maka konsep pemerintahan yang baik menurut Islam perlu dikaji secara mendalam, sering disebut dengan konsep fiqh siyasah. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk meneliti perbandingan antara konsep Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik di satu sisi dengan konsep fiqh siyasah di sisi yang lain. Abstract The General Principles of Good Government are currently one of the assessment bases for the judges in the Administrative Court to examine whether or not actions of the government contains the elements of harm for the community. The existence of Law No.30 of 2014 on Government Administration has expanded the competence of The Administrative Court (PTUN) in which the object of lawsuit in the Administrative Court is not only the Decisions of Administrative (beschikking) but also factual action from official or administrative institutions. With the amendment of Law No.5 of 1986 on the Administrative Court namely Law No. 9 of 2004 and Law No.51 of 2009 affirms the existence of The General Principles of Good Government as one of reasons to sue in the Administrative Court. It is inevitable today that the concept of Islamic law is widely used and applied in legal actions, whether in the realm of business law, private law or public law. Therefore, the concept of good government according to Islam needs to be studied further, often referred to as the concept of fiqh siyasah. This study is aimed to examine the comparison between the concept of The General Principles of Good Government with the concept of fiqh siyasah.

AbstractThis article try to analyze the concept of administrative effort and it implementation at the court. Enacted of Act Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration leads the change of administrative court system in Indonesia. One of these change related to administrative effort. Legal issues in this article research is: first, do administrative effort must be taken before sues to administrative court; and second, whether original administrative decision or edministrative effort decision that used as an dispute object when apply a administrative lawsuit to administrative court. In accordance with the legal issues above, this article research is normative research to seek solutions to legal issues which are emerged. The results which have to be achieved are to provide the prescription of essential truth. There are several problems approach used in this study, such as statute approach and conceptual approach. Expected of this research can be found a norm that can be provides legal protection for the people especially in administrative dispute. In Addition, this research trying to analize of legal protection principle over government action on public law and law enforcement of legal public act by government that could be pursued if there is any detrimental to society. Abstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa konsep mengenai upaya administratif dan penerapannya di pengadilan. Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan membawa perubahan dalam sistem peradilan tata usaha negara di Indonesia. Salah satu perubahan tersebut berkaitan dengan upaya administratif. Isu hukum dalam penelitian artikel ini pertama apakah upaya administratif harus ditempuh terlebih dahulu sebelum mengajukan gugatan sengketa tata usaha negara ke PTUN; dan kedua apakah keputusan tata usaha negara awal atau keputusan upaya administratif yang dijadikan obyek sengketa apabila mengajukan gugatan di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Sesuai dengan isu hukum di atas, maka penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif untuk mencari pemecahan atas isu hukum yang timbul. Hasil yang hendak dicapai adalah memberikan preskripsi tentang kebenaran yang hakiki. Diharapkan dari penelitian ini didapatkan formulasi norma yang dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat khususnya dalam hal sengketa tata usaha Negara dan menganalisis tentang hakikat dari perbuatan hukum publik oleh pemerintah dan penegakan hukum terhadap perbuatan pemerintah dalam hukum publik yang merugikan masyarakat.

The enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration had given the changes to the authority of the State Administrative Court. There are two mechanism of the case investigation in the State Administrative Court in providing legal protection against a lawsuit or petition filed by the public. The first mechanism is to file a lawsuit directly to the State Administrative Court. The second mechanism is to resolve internal disputes within the government before filing a lawsuit to the Administrative Courts. There are two mechanisms of the case investigation prove that the existence of discrimination for people who seek justice in the case investigation system in the State Administrative Court. This research focus on an issues first the nature of public legal action by the government in government administration and second Ratio legis non-judicial legal protection against public legal acts by the government. The results which have to be achieved are to provide the prescription of essential truth. There are several problems approach used in this study, such as statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach.

Nowadays, The Institutional of environmental in regional experinced many changes, its cause of stipulated of Law No. 23 of 2014 on Local Government and Government Act No. 18 of 2016 on Local Government Organization. Rule about central government authority and local government authority on environment aspect that ruled by Act No. 32 of 2009 on Protection and Management of Environment must be adjusted with Act No. 23 of 2014 on Local Government and Government Act No. 18 of 2016 on Local Government Organization. This research analyze about institutional harmonization on statute approaches. It is expected that this research give a knowledge of affairs which central government authority, province government authority, and district/regency government authority clearly especially on environment aspect. The minister of environment and forestry in order to implementing coordinative function, should be obliged to synchronize working program of environment institution between local and central government for making integrated environment management (policy) approaches.

Benefits of e-procurement is not only for the agency or the developer of the system itself but also for the providers of goods and services and the general public who want to know the process of procurement of goods and services procurement organizers get More bid prices and more simple nobility processes. As for the provider of goods/services can expand the business opportunity, create a healthy business competition, open the opportunity of business actors openly for anyone and reduce administrative costs. Additionally, e-procurement is also believed to improve collaboration between buyers and suppliers, reducing personnel needs, improving coordination, reducing transaction costs, shorter buying and selling of goods, facilitatingGreater inventory and transparency. Information technology can make costs more effective and public procurement systems are more innovative

Dental artisan is a common and preferred profession that has been widely known amongst the general public due to its low price. However, because the job was unsafe, the dental artisan was prohibited by Legislation No. 29 of 2004 on Medical Practice and the Ministry of Health Regulation No. 1871/MENKES/PER/IX/2011 on the Repeal of the Ministry of Health Regulation No. 339/MENKES/PER/V/1989. On the other hand, the Constitutional Court, through its decision No. 40/PUU-X/2012 has re-legalized the dental artisan profession. Amongst considerations made by the Constitutional Court, the re-legalization was caused because although the profession has a high risk of security, it can be settled through teaching, licensing, and supervision, instead of prohibition. This research is juridical research that studies the existent legislation provision on the legal protection regarded to dental artisan in Indonesia. Based on this research, it was noticed that: First, under Article 6 (1) of Ministry of Health Regulation No. 39 of 2014, a dental artisan is only allowed to, (a) create a partial or complete removable dentures that are made out of heat curing acrylic, that adheres to health standard requirements, (b) install a partial or complete removable dentures that are made out of heat curing acrylic without covering the patient"s left-tooth root. In the event a dental artisan conducted practice outside of the two, the City or Regency Local Government will impose an administrative sanction upon them. Second, the form of teaching, licensing, and supervision intended by the government will be given directly to the City of Regency Local Government to decide appropriately.

National development planning model with its long-term time dimension in Indonesia is carried out with the National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN) which replaces the Planned Overall National Development (PNSB) and the General Outlines of the Principles of the State (GBHN). Based on the analysis of the data obtained, it can be seen that since 2004 the use of the RPJN has turned out to cause fluctuating dynamics in the existing development outcomes. The occurred changes resulted in inconsistencies in the direction of development when there was a change of state development actors such as President, Governor, Regent/ Mayor, and other state institutions. The reason for this is that there is no permanent structure that can be used as a reference for a long-term development program that will be carried out by the managing state institutions, particularly the government. Based on this, the aim of this study was to create a form of reformulation of the principles of the state. This research was a normative research with a statutory, historical and conceptual approaches. To answer this problem, the idea of the state principles was born which departed from combining the advantages of PNSB, GBHN, and RPJPN which were then packaged into a new state principle system, with ideological principle and technocratic strategy.

Setiap negara tentulah memiliki sebuah konstitusi yang pada umumnya digunakan sebagai pedoman pada saat menjalankan roda pemerintahannya. Dalam konstitusi di Indonesia yang menerapkan sistem pemerintahan presidensiil, menggunakan konsep pemisahan kekuasaan (separation of power) antar lembaga yang digunakan dalam rangka menjalankan prinsip pemerintahan dengan checks and balances. Salah satunya adalah terhadap hal pengelolaan keuangan negara yang dituangkan dalam bentuk Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara (APBN) setiap tahunnya. UUD NRI 1945 memberikan kewenangan kepada Presiden sebagai lembaga eksekutif dalam mengajukan RAPBN serta memberikan sebuah kewenangan kepada DPR sebagai lembaga legislatif untuk menyetujui RAPBN yang diajukan oleh Presiden. Penyetujuan DPR atas RAPBN dianggap sebagai hal yang krusial dalam pembentukan dan penetapan APBN sehingga dalam tulisan ini akan mengemukakan problematika apabila terjadi penolakan terhadap RAPBN oleh DPR serta upaya yang dapat ditempuh oleh eksekutif dalam menyelesaikan persoalan tersebut. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hokum normatif dan simpulan dari tulisan ini adalah hubungan antara pemerintah dengan DPR berupa hubungan check and balances dan pemerintah dapat mengambil opsi dengan mewujudkan Perpu APBN dalam hal terjadi penolakan RUU APBN oleh DPR.